Bad Reason Fallacy
Bad Reason Fallacy occurs when a conclusion is supported by reasons that do not actually justify it.
The Form
A claim is presented.
A reason is given.
The reason does not logically support the claim.
The presence of a reason does not guarantee that the reason is relevant or sufficient.
A Simple Example
“This must be true because it feels right.”
The statement offers a reason, but not one that supports the conclusion.
Why This Reasoning Fails
The fallacy mistakes having a reason for having a good reason.
Reasons must logically connect to the claim; otherwise, they add no evidential weight.
Where it commonly appears
- Religious and supernatural claims
- Political rhetoric
- Pseudoscience
- Everyday justifications
Example in god claims
“God exists because the universe is beautiful.”
Beauty does not logically imply a divine cause. The reason offered does not establish the conclusion.
How to avoid this fallacy
Ask:
Does this reason actually increase the likelihood of the claim being true?
Related concepts
- Burden of Proof
- Non Sequitur
- Relevance
OpenLogic Reminder
A reason is only useful if it actually supports the conclusion.